Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/30556
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorde Sá, J.-
dc.contributor.authorAlcalde-Cabero, E.-
dc.contributor.authorAlmazán-Isla, Javier-
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Sempere, Angel-
dc.contributor.authorde Pedro-Cuesta, Jesus-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Medicina Clínicaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-22T17:51:34Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-22T17:51:34Z-
dc.date.created2012-04-
dc.identifier.citationNeuroepidemiology Volume 38, Issue 4es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1423-0208-
dc.identifier.issn0251-5350-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/30556-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Capture-recapture methods (CRMs) are well established in epidemiologic surveillance and considered useful for the task of correcting for case-finding limitations in multiple sclerosis (MS) prevalence surveys. To date, however, CRMs have been exclusively applied to crude prevalence figures. This study therefore sought to explore an age-specific application of this method to an urban Portuguese population of 229,342. Methods: We used a CRM to correct for the age-specific prevalence of MS obtained from two data sources, i.e. general practitioners in three primary-care districts and a neurology unit at the referral hospital. The corrected figures were adjusted for age using the European standard population as reference. Results: When applied to 95 MS patients, the CRM impact was highest at ages 50–59 years, with a 110% increase in cases where the corrected prevalence was highest, i.e. 181.8 (95% CI 75.7–287.9) per 100,000, and lowest, nil, at ages ≥70 years, with an unchanged corrected prevalence of 13.8. The crude prevalence of 41.4 per 100,000 increased by 36% to 56.20 per 100,000 when it was CRM- and age-adjusted. Source independence was poor. Conclusions: CRMs can be differentially applied to MS counts. Valid comparisons may require simultaneous adjustment for age and other variables, such as diagnostic delay and diagnostic criteria. CRM applications to crude figures and dependent sources should be approached with caution.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent8es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherKarger Publisherses_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCapture-recapture methodses_ES
dc.subjectEpidemiologyes_ES
dc.subjectMultiple sclerosis prevalencees_ES
dc.subjectPublic healthes_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::6 - Ciencias aplicadas::61 - Medicinaes_ES
dc.titleCapture-Recapture as a Potentially Useful Procedure for Assessing Prevalence of Multiple Sclerosis: Methodologic Exercise Using Portuguese Dataes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1159/000337534es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones:
Artículos Medicina Clínica


Vista previa

Ver/Abrir:
 9-Neuroepidemiology (1).pdf

310,12 kB
Adobe PDF
Compartir:


Creative Commons La licencia se describe como: Atribución-NonComercial-NoDerivada 4.0 Internacional.