Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/11000/29194
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGehrke, Sergio-
dc.contributor.authorCastro Cortellari, Guillermo-
dc.contributor.authorDe Aza, Piedad-
dc.contributor.authorCavalcanti de Lima, José Henrique-
dc.contributor.authorPrados Frutos, Juan Carlos-
dc.contributor.otherDepartamentos de la UMH::Ciencia de Materiales, Óptica y Tecnología Electrónicaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-25T11:26:57Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-25T11:26:57Z-
dc.date.created2023-04-
dc.identifier.citationHelyion v.9, nº4 (2023)es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2405-8440-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11000/29194-
dc.description.abstractMicromotion between a dental implant and abutment can adversely affect clinical performance and compromise successful osseointegration by creating a bacterial harbor, enabling screw loosening, and imparting disruptive lateral forces on the cortical bone. Thus, the aim of the present study was to measure the abutment stability evolution using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) in vivo at four different times (baseline, 3, 4, and 12 months), and compare these data obtained with the RFA measured after mechanical cycling (in vitro) corresponding to the proposed times in numbers of cycles. Methods To evaluate the abutment stability, RFA was performed in 70 sets of implant/abutment (IA) with a total of 54 patients (31 women, 23 men). These IA sets were divided into three groups, according to the abutment angulation: straight abutment (Abt1 group), 17-degree angled abutment (Abt2 group), and 30-degree angled abutment (Abt3 group). Abutment stability was measured immediately at implant placement and the abutment installation (T1), 3 (T2), 4 (T3), and 12 months (T4) later. For the in vitro analysis, ten sets of each group were submitted to mechanical cycling: T1 = 0 cycles, T2 = 90,000 cycles, T3 = 120,000 cycles, and T4 = 360,000 cycles. All data collected were statistically evaluated using the GraphPad Prism 5.01 software, with the level of significance was α = 0.05. Results In vivo, the overall data of implant stability quotient (ISQ) values obtained for all groups in each evaluation time were 61.5 ± 3.94 (95% CI: [60–63]) at T1, 62.8 ± 3.73 (95% CI, [61–64]) at T2, 63.4 ± 3.08 (95% CI: [61–64]) at T3, and 65.5 ± 4.33 (95% CI: [63–68]) at T4. Whereas in vitro, the ISQ were 61.5 ± 2.66 (95% CI: [59–63]) at T1, 63.2 ± 3.02 (95% CI, [61–65]) at T2, 63.9 ± 2.55 (95% CI: [62–66]) at T3, and 66.5 ± 2.97 (95% CI: [64–68]) at T4. In both evaluations (in vivo and in vitro), the data showed a significant difference (ANOVA test with p < 0.0001). The RFA to measure the abutment stability used in this study showed that there was a progressive increase in stability among the predetermined times for the measurements, in both analysis (in vivo and in vitro). Furthermore, the values at each time point were similar, with no statistical difference between themes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipPart of this work was supported by Ministry of Science and Innovation—Grant PID2020-116693 R B-C21 funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13,039/501,100,011,033-
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.format.extent10es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAbutment stabilityes_ES
dc.subjectAbutment micromotiones_ES
dc.subjectResonance frequency analysises_ES
dc.subjectMechanical fatiges_ES
dc.subjectClinical retrospective studyes_ES
dc.subject.otherCDU::6 - Ciencias aplicadas::62 - Ingeniería. Tecnologíaes_ES
dc.titleBiomechanical evaluation of abutment stability in morse taper implant connections in different times: A retrospective clinical study compared with an in vitro analysises_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15312es_ES
Appears in Collections:
Artículos CIENCIA DE LOS MATERIALES ÓPTICA Y TECNOLOGÍA ELECTRÓNICA


Thumbnail

View/Open:
 3-2023 Helyon Sergio.pdf

1,94 MB
Adobe PDF
Share:


Creative Commons ???jsp.display-item.text9???